N.J. offers new defense of embattled housing plan

In COAH, Jon Corzine, Ridgewood New Jersey on March 10, 2009 at 1:39 pm


Posted by cjrothma March 09, 2009 20:31PM

Gov. Jon Corzine’s campaign pledge to get more housing built for the working class entered a new phase today, with the state agency overseeing his ambitious plan defending it against two dozen legal challenges.

More than 30 years after the opening shots were fired in the state’s housing wars, towns allege new state housing rules will bankrupt them. And, they say, they are unearthing ugly secrets about the accuracy of state housing formulas.

Patti Sapone/The Star-LedgerJoseph V. Doria, Jr. Commissioner of the Department of Community Affairs, speaks during a Senate Budget and Appropriations meeting in Trenton in April 2008.

The New Jersey League of Municipalities has accused state officials of withholding vital documents — including a study that appears to poke holes in the state’s analysis of how much vacant land remains in New Jersey. Builders and housing advocates, meanwhile, argue the new rules will allow suburbs to again shirk their responsibilities to the poor.

In a 130-page response to the challenges, filed today, the state Council on Affordable Housing painted itself as caught in the middle of warring parties, arguing it had been reasonable in drafting its sweeping new rules.

“At their essence … appellants’ complaints are that the obligations imposed on the municipalities are either too high or too low,” the state wrote.

In a sometimes arcane defense, the state downplayed the importance of the vacant-land spat, arguing any errors could be corrected and accusing towns of exaggerating its importance to the calculations.

“Gov. Corzine has a sincere commitment to providing housing for all the people of this state,” Joe Doria, who is heading up the state housing effort as commissioner of the Department of Community Affairs, said in an interview last week. “My purpose is to build as many affordable housing units as possible even in tough economic times.”

At issue are new regulations the state drafted in 2004, an attempt to move away from a 20-year-old method of getting housing built. It attempted to replace town-by-town quotas with a “growth share” system, which requires towns to build one affordable unit whenever it builds a certain amount of market-rate housing or commercial development.

The Supreme Court rejected the formula in 2007, and COAH went back to the drawing board. New regulations approved in July made it tougher on towns, requiring them to build one affordable unit for every four units of market-rate housing or 16 jobs created through commercial construction.

About half the towns in the state argue they will be required to
build far too much affordable housing and they vehemently oppose how COAH plans to implement its approach.

“Anyone who stands up and says the affordable housing numbers are wrong is called a racist,” said Nick Corcodilos, a former mayor of Clinton Township in Hunterdon County, which banded together with 19 other towns in one of the legal challenges. “This has nothing to do with racism or wanting to keep people out. It’s about whether the infrastructure can support these units.”

To enforce its growth-share approach and satisfy the Supreme Court, COAH instituted a kind of backup system. It estimated 115,666 new affordable units are needed by 2018 to satisfy demand; using a statewide analysis of vacant land, historical building permit data and predicted job growth, it then estimated future growth for each town and assigned a share of the affordable units.

Although towns would not technically have to build any units unless they actually grow, officials must file a report with COAH detailing how they will meet the presumed obligation and change their zoning to ensure it could happen.

“It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy,” said Michael Cerra of the League of Municipalities. “You zone for it, and it will come.”

The state argued in its papers that requiring towns to plan for the growth is proof the new rules will not allow them to exclude the poor.

That was a response to groups like the New Jersey Builders Association, which argued allowing towns not to grow was a direct contradiction of more than 30 years of Supreme Court rulings that say every town has an obligation to accept a fair share of housing for the poor.

In its own filing, the nonprofit Fair Share Housing Center in South Jersey argued towns have never resisted affordable housing more vehemently.

“Municipal desire to exclude has increased,” said Kevin Walsh of Fair Share. “Municipal desire to discourage schoolchildren from moving in is at an all-time high.”

Things got ugly in the case last month, when the league lashed out at COAH, accusing it of withholding a report that appeared to show deep flaws in the way the state calculates vacant land. Stuart Koenig, a longtime league lawyer representing 20 towns, said analysis by four counties showed highway interchanges, the green in front of the Warren County Courthouse, warehouses, corporate and college campuses, prisons and cemeteries were listed as vacant.

Doria, the community affairs commissioner who served as COAH’s chairman, denied there was any intent to hide the report and said the state will correct any errors towns points out.

Koenig argued the deck is so stacked against towns that it would be nearly impossible to get a vacant-land adjustment from COAH. He said towns trying to meet the numbers will have to zone inappropriately for high-rises or other high-density development.

“Municipalities are being compelled to provide unreasonable affordable housing numbers on flawed methodology,” he said.


  1. On a separate note: Last night, there were 2 questions posed (at least) from the public. Where and when do these get answered. I could not watch the whole thing, but one of the board members mentioned that they have until before the next meeting to answer. I was wondering, in what forum? The questions were:

    1. What (if anything) did regina say to the language teachers and supervisor at the high school that prevented (threatened?) them from coming to the meeting tonight in support of trying to keep the elementary Spanish program
    and 2.What exactly does the word reorganization mean? Is it a staff reduction and if so, who does is affect? What postions? How many?

    To my knowledge, no answers were given, although I may be mistaken.

  2. Drove down Glen road for first time in awhile today — are they building a pedestrian overpass at the corner of Glen, Heights and S Hill??

  3. PJ, you maight want to check this article out:


    about Corzine eliminating property tax deductions next year to everyone except seniors….

  4. Drove down Glen road for first time in awhile today — are they building a pedestrian overpass at the corner of Glen, Heights and S Hill??

    Are you insane?

  5. Who asked the State to get into the business of housing entitlements? A house used to be something aspired to and earned. Now they are giving them away?

  6. With real estate offices in central , northern and western New Jersey, our company, Blue Realty GMAC Real Estate Services, gets to see the impact throughout the affected areas, Affordable Housing guidelines will no doubt have more profound affect on some areas than others, but overall has not created any ‘bad’ situations that I have come across in terms of ownership. It does, however, particularly in this climate, and a lot of pressure to the already pressured home developers, for sure, and will act as a impediment (which today may not be that bad!) to new development

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: